EFSA toxicology reference values

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran

SOURCE efsa openfoodtox 3 0 export repository

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran (CAS 16409-43-1). Cannabis testing data across 0 states. Action levels when present, testing requirements, compliance status.

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran is a cannabis analyte contaminant represented in the cannabis public dataset.

CAS 16409-43-1 Cannabis Analyte

Substance Identity

Analyte identity and classification used for this cannabis substance page.

SOURCE efsa substances
Analyte name
2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran
CAS number
16409-43-1
Contaminant class
Cannabis Analyte

Contaminant Class Badge

Color-coded cannabis class signal for scanning pesticide, metal, solvent, mycotoxin, and potency pages.

SOURCE State Cannabis Regulations
Cannabis Analyte Cannabis contaminant class used to group state testing rows.

Dataset Snapshot

Compact public-data summary for page quality, state coverage, lab rows, and potency sample groups.

SOURCE cannabis page data
Quality score
2
thin
Jurisdictions
0
No state rows
Lab/analyte rows
0
0 failed (-)
Potency samples
0
16409-43-1

EFSA Substance Identity

EFSA substance identity rows matched by chemical name or CAS.

SOURCE efsa openfoodtox 3 0 export repository
2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran
CAS 16409-43-1 / mono-constituent substance
C10H18O / 3 dossier(s)

EFSA Reference Values

Reference values from efsa_reference_values_v2 for toxicology and food-safety context.

SOURCE efsa openfoodtox 3 0 export repository
DescriptorValuePopulationEndpointBody
MSI/FC 0.3 mg/kg salmon - -
MSI/FC 0.3 mg/kg other: - -
MSI/FC 0.3 mg/kg other: - -
MSI/FC 0.5 mg/kg other: - -
MSI/FC 0.5 mg/kg other: - -
TTC Cramer Class II 9 µg/kg bw/day consumers - -
TTC Cramer Class II 9 µg/kg bw/day consumers - -

EFSA Study Results

Endpoint-level study rows from efsa_study_results matched to this substance.

SOURCE efsa openfoodtox 3 0 export repository
EndpointSpeciesRouteEffectAssessment
Carcinogenicity_EU_PPP - - - The Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (the Panel) is asked to advise the Commission on the implications for human health of chemically defined flavouring substances used in or on foodstuffs in the Member States. In particular the Scientific Panel is requested to consider the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA) evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000, and to decide whether no further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. These flavouring substances are listed in the register which was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC and its consecutive amendments. The present consideration concerns 29 aliphatic and aromatic ethers evaluated by JECFA (61st meeting) and will be considered in relation to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) evaluation of 14 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives evaluated in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23 (FGE.23). The Panel concluded that all the 29 substances in the JECFA flavouring group of aliphatic and aromatic ethers are structurally related to the group of 14 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives from chemical groups 15, 16 and 26 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.23.
Carcinogenicity_EU_PPP - - - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of four compounds (aliphatic and alicyclic ethers belonging to chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. All are currently authorised for use as flavours in food and have all been detected in plant materials, or in processed foods, however the reports of their distribution vary greatly.
Carcinogenicity_EU_PPP - - - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (the Panel) to provide scientific advice to the Commission on the implications for human health of chemically defined flavouring substances used in or on foodstuffs in the Member States. In particular, the Panel was requested to consider the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA) evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000, and to decide whether no further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. These flavouring substances are listed in the Register, which was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC and its consecutive amendments. The present consideration concerns a group of 30 flavouring substances consisting of aliphatic and aromatic ethers by the JECFA (61st and 63rd meeting) and will be considered in relation to the EFSA evaluation of 19 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives of evaluated in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23, Revision 2 (FGE.23Rev2).The Panel concluded that all the 30 substances in the JECFA flavouring group of aliphatic and aromatic ethers are structurally related to the group of 19 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives from chemical groups 15, 16, 22, 26 and 30 evaluated by EFSA in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23, Revision 2 (FGE.23Rev2).
Genetic Toxicity - - - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (the Panel) to provide scientific advice to the Commission on the implications for human health of chemically defined flavouring substances used in or on foodstuffs in the Member States. In particular, the Panel was requested to consider the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA) evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000, and to decide whether no further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. These flavouring substances are listed in the Register, which was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC and its consecutive amendments. The present consideration concerns a group of 30 flavouring substances consisting of aliphatic and aromatic ethers by the JECFA (61st and 63rd meeting) and will be considered in relation to the EFSA evaluation of 19 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives of evaluated in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23, Revision 2 (FGE.23Rev2).The Panel concluded that all the 30 substances in the JECFA flavouring group of aliphatic and aromatic ethers are structurally related to the group of 19 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives from chemical groups 15, 16, 22, 26 and 30 evaluated by EFSA in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23, Revision 2 (FGE.23Rev2).
Genetic Toxicity - - - The Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (the Panel) is asked to advise the Commission on the implications for human health of chemically defined flavouring substances used in or on foodstuffs in the Member States. In particular the Scientific Panel is requested to consider the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA) evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000, and to decide whether no further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. These flavouring substances are listed in the register which was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC and its consecutive amendments. The present consideration concerns 29 aliphatic and aromatic ethers evaluated by JECFA (61st meeting) and will be considered in relation to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) evaluation of 14 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives evaluated in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23 (FGE.23). The Panel concluded that all the 29 substances in the JECFA flavouring group of aliphatic and aromatic ethers are structurally related to the group of 14 aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic ethers including anisole derivatives from chemical groups 15, 16 and 26 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.23.
Genetic Toxicity - - - Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of four compounds (aliphatic and alicyclic ethers belonging to chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. All are currently authorised for use as flavours in food and have all been detected in plant materials, or in processed foods, however the reports of their distribution vary greatly.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ answers are generated from the same fetched cannabis, EFSA, cosmetics, and chemical rows rendered above.

SOURCE page FAQ dataset

What is the regulatory limit for 2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran in cannabis?

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran does not have a numeric cannabis_contaminant_tests range in the fetched page data. The current page query does not expose a separate action-limit column.

Which states test for 2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran?

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran does not have state-level cannabis testing rows in the fetched page data.

What are the EFSA reference values for 2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran?

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran has 7 EFSA OpenFoodTox reference value rows in the cannabis database, including MSI/FC, TTC Cramer Class II.

Is 2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran also regulated in cosmetics or food?

2-(2-Methylprop-1-enyl)-4-methyltetrahydropyran has a cosmetics ingredient cross-reference with EU status permitted. EFSA food/toxicology context is available on this page.